Constraining the Evolutionary History of the Moon and the Inner Solar System: A Case for New Returned Lunar SamplesOPEN ACCESS 

· by · in , ,

Romain Tartèse, Mahesh Anand, Jérôme Gattacceca, Katherine H. Joy, James I. Mortimer, John F. Pernet-Fisher, Sara Russell, Joshua F. Snape, Benjamin P. Weiss

Space Science Reviews
November 2019, 215:54

LINK (OPEN ACCESS)
PDF (OPEN ACCESS)

“The Moon is the only planetary body other than the Earth for which samples have been collected in situ by humans and robotic missions and returned to Earth. Scientific investigations of the first lunar samples returned by the Apollo 11 astronauts 50 years ago transformed the way we think most planetary bodies form and evolve. Identification of anorthositic clasts in Apollo 11 samples led to the formulation of the magma ocean concept, and by extension the idea that the Moon experienced large-scale melting and differentiation. This concept of magma oceans would soon be applied to other terrestrial planets and large asteroidal bodies. Dating of basaltic fragments returned from the Moon also showed that a relatively small planetary body could sustain volcanic activity for more than a billion years after its formation. Finally, studies of the lunar regolith showed that in addition to containing a treasure trove of the Moon’s history, it also provided us with a rich archive of the past 4.5 billion years of evolution of the inner Solar System. Further investigations of samples returned from the Moon over the past five decades led to many additional discoveries, but also raised new and fundamental questions that are difficult to address with currently available samples, such as those related to the age of the Moon, duration of lunar volcanism, the lunar paleomagnetic field and its intensity, and the record on the Moon of the bombardment history during the first billion years of evolution of the Solar System. In this contribution, we review the information we currently have on some of the key science questions related to the Moon and discuss how future sample-return missions could help address important knowledge gaps.”

Related posts (automatically generated):

  1. On the history of the early meteoritic bombardment of the Moon: was there a terminal lunar cataclysm?
  2. The early geological history of the Moon inferred from ancient lunar meteorite Miller Range 13317OPEN ACCESS 
  3. Constraining the source regions of lunar meteorites using orbital geochemical data
  4. Chang’E-5 samples reveal high water content in lunar mineralsOPEN ACCESS 
  5. Constraining the formation and transport of lunar impact glasses using the ages and chemical compositions of Chang’e-5 glass beadsOPEN ACCESS 
  6. Evidence of water on the lunar surface from Chang’E-5 in-situ spectra and returned samplesOPEN ACCESS 
  7. Late accretionary history of Earth and Moon preserved in lunar impactitesOPEN ACCESS 
  8. Solar energetic particle tracks in lunar samples: A transmission electron microscope calibration and implications for lunar space weatheringOPEN ACCESS 
  9. Discovery of moganite in a lunar meteorite as a trace of H2O ice in the Moon’s regolithOPEN ACCESS 
  10. Laboratory construction and curation scheme for returned samples of the chang’e-5 missionOPEN ACCESS 
Tags: , , ,